Dhiraagu official writes following our condemnation
of the London bombings
The following letter to
the Editor was received from someone who appears to be an employee
of Dhivehi Raajeeyge Gulhun Private Limited (Dhiraagu), the Maldive
subsidiary of the British telecommunications firm Cable & Wireless
PLC. He used his company account to send the email.
It is deplorable if a subsidiary of a British firm would allow employees
to use company resources to empathise with the bloodthirsty Islamic
terrorists who caused mayhem in the capital city of Great Britain.
It is rather disturbing to see that you have
consistently spread anti Islamic sentiment using your web site.
In the free society of present day, only a few people like yourself
and Salman Rushdy (incidentally both of you have Arabic names) have
tried so hard to disregard the faith and belief of so many people
of the world. Yet surprisingly enough you have advocated equality,
decency, freedom and rights of people. Why has Islam been the exception
all the time and every time? Buddhism doesn’t come even close
to Islam in terms of the believer base. So don’t you think
you are giving the impression of being biased, very undemocratic
(like the homosexual kings of your ancestry) and trying to influence
others to believe the way you do? Have you not heard the speech
given by Tony Blair after the London bomb attack? If you haven’t
so far, better do it sooner rather than later so you could learn
how to be a gentleman without showing the cannibalistic instincts
you have against Islam and the billions of its believers.
The site editor replies:
19 July 2005
Dear Ibrahim Saeed,
British subsidiary firm's employee writes back:
Ibrahim Saeed did not reply to this email but on 20 September
2005, wrote and asked that his email be removed from the
site.
In his email he said that he was "receiving occassional
e-mails regarding the subject which I don't particularly
welcome." and that he was receiving quite a number
of requests to be added as an Internet chat contact.
He asked the editor of this web site to contact him if
there is anything to be clarified as to the content and
motive of his original comments. If he reads the reply
to him on this page he will find that he was asked to
clarify certain things. Perhaps he may start by addressing
those.
Ibrahim Saeed appears to have written his original email
as a result of this web site's strong condemnation of
the Islamic terrorist attacks on London, England. He must
join this web site in condemning that barbaric attack
and other similar attacks on civilisation. As an employee
of a subsidiary of the British firm Cable
& Wireless PLC who wrote to this
web site on his employer's email ID, this would be entirely
appropriate.
He should also condemn his government's on-going insults
on the British people such as the effective confiscation
of tonnes of tsunami aid given to the people of the Maldives,
on the grounds that the aid was a trick to convert the
Maldives to Christianity.
On 25 September Saeed wrote: "I
am with you and the rest of the world including all Muslims
in condemning terrorism. Islam doesn't support or encourage
terrorism but it forbids all kinds of terrorism."
It all depends on what he defines terrorism as. Interestingly
Saeed still carefully avoids condemning the Islamic terror
attacks on London, a city that is within what is known
as Dar el-Harb, the Abode of War. It is the solemn
obligation of every Muslim to wage Jihad until
infidels in the Dar el-Harb become Muslims or
are humiliated and reduced into the status of dhimmah
(conquered fourth class humans -after Muslim men, women
and slaves- paying tribute to the Caliphate). Islam condemns
to death all infidels who do not submit.
It will be interesting to see if Saeed classes
an act of Jihad, such as the attacks on London,
as an act of terrorism. Will he be more comfortable with
the following point of view?
|
I’m not too sure what you mean by anti-Islamic sentiment.
What is in the web site is totally legal. If it has contravened
any law please let me know which law it is and I shall endeavour
to address the issue.
There is a whole raft of information in the site and the site
has been up on the Worldwide Web for the past six years. As I
have indicated, there are certain articles that are not written
by me. These would show either a legal name of the author or a
pseudonym. You have not indicated which article or specific issues
have inspired you to write to me. Unless you are specific, I am
unable to give you a definitive response to what you have written.
Indeed I have condemned the terrorist attack on the United Kingdom,
as have many other people around the world. It would have been
distasteful not to. I have also referred to the extremist elements
in British society that have perpetrated that horrendous crime.
Like others, I found out the persuasion of the terrorists from
the public news media. It is common knowledge and I have not added
anything new. You have asked me to refer to Prime Minister Blair’s
speech. Mr. Blair did use the phrase, “the evil ideology
that leads to terrorism”.
I am not sure why you have referred to Buddhism. I do not see
the relevance. As far as I am aware no Buddhist was involved in
the London tragedy- not even a victim. You have also written “Buddhism
doesn’t come even close to Islam in terms of the believer
base”. In logic, this type of statement comes under the
definition of “argumentum ad numerum” That is to say
that something is true if a lot of people believe in it. Argumentum
ad numerum is a logical fallacy.
The fact that the kings who were my ancestors were undemocratic
has nothing to do with their alleged sexuality. Most of the world
was undemocratic (as it still is) in their time and they did not
claim or pretend to be democratic. As to their sexuality, I am
not sure if any of my ancestors were homosexual. If you have evidence
to the contrary, please let me have it. Given the fact that they
have produced a lineage, and you yourself concede that I am their
descendant, some of them might have been, if anything, bisexual
if not heterosexual. Homosexuals loathe heterosexual cohabitation
and usually do not produce descendants. Scientific research shows
that 10% of mankind, irrespective of ethnicity or social class,
exhibit either homosexual or bisexual tendencies. Given this statistic,
it is likely that some of your ancestors were also bisexual. If
you have evidence to the contrary, please let me have that too.
Have you heard of the adage: “let he who is without sin,
cast the first stone”?
By the way, Salman Rushdie has a part-Arabic name. Rushdie is
Arabic but Salman is Persian (Farsi). Salman Rushdie’s family
was from India, a country that was brutally conquered and colonized
by Arabs and Arabised Persians, Turks and Mongols, who all enforced
the Arab culture over many centuries. That is why many Indians
still have Arabic names. Indeed, India was conquered and ruled
more recently by European powers, most notably the British. Yet
there are very few Indians with English, Portuguese or French
names. You will be aware that the Portuguese left India in the
1960s, the French in the 1950s and the British in the 1940s. The
Arab-Persian-Mongol (Mughal) colonialists were subdued early in
the 18th century and finally defeated in 1856. There is no doubt
that the damage done to the highly advanced civilization of India
by Arabs and Arab proxies is more profound and longer lasting
than the combined downside of European colonization.
And yes, my name is Arabic too. Traditionally my family members
had Divehi names, including my eldest 3 siblings. Under pressure
from the increasingly powerful mullahs of the time, the family
was forced to abandon their Divehi names and adopt Arabic names
in the 1930s. As I am too young, unfortunately I was never given
a Divehi name. That was how I ended up with a colonialist name.
I have not carried this colonialist insult into my posterity.
I have given my son three names, the middle and the last being
Divehi. His first name is a common name in New Zealand. It is
an old tradition to give a child a name of the country in which
he or she is born. When I was very young, our doctor in Malé
was from Poland. He and his wife had a daughter born in Malé.
They called her Donmanike.
Mr Saeed, let us unite in celebrating the Brotherhood of Man
and condemn all attacks on civilization!
With best wishes
Majid
The following is the text of
this web site's condemnation of the barbaric attacks on
London by bloodthirsty Islamic terrorists. This was what
drew the reaction from the employee of the British subsidiary
firm.
Regent's
Park Mosque, London. The tolerant people of Great
Britain allow freedom of thought. This is reciprocated
with bombs. |
London explosions:
This web site strongly condemns the explosions in London
that commenced at 8:51 am on Thursday, July 7th.
We send our condolences to the people of Great Britain and
in particular to those families that are affected by this
horrific tragedy. There were seven blasts that hit the metropolitan
transport system and they appear to be coordinated. Confirmed
reports point to British Mohamedan terrorists of Pakistani
origin as the perpetrators. It has long been the aim of
British-based Mohamedan extremists to force an Islamic republic
over the United Kingdom. The attack on London is an act
of barbarism committed by savages intent on destroying civilisation
as we know it.
The Maldive president of the republic is reported to have
condemned the terror attacks. He did not condemn the perpetrators
or their barbaric ideology. As such, the condemnation could
be dismissed as mere diplomatic lip-service. The chairman
of the only opposition party in the Maldives (MDP) made
a mild statement in English, seemingly in a private capacity.
The web site of his party remains totally silent on the
tragedy. |